clm.dev

My Ideal Software Dev Board Workflow

June 9, 2020

...

Columns

  1. Incoming
  2. In Progress
  3. Peer Review
  4. Ready to Promote
  5. In QA
  6. In Stage
  7. UX Acceptance
  8. Done

Brief column descriptions

Labels

  1. blocked (red)
  2. dev-approved (green)
  3. (qa stage)-tested (green)
  4. ux-approved (green) ux-changes-requested (red)

Labels represent a cumulative record of “what got done”, something we can audit when something goes wrong to provide feedback on our workflow.

Workflow

In general, tickets move left to right only. This protects certain columns from abuse or becoming “dumping grounds”. It also helps tickets reflect their “true” progress through the workflow.

Incoming

All tickets start in “Incoming” at the beginning of the sprint.

In Progress

When a dev begins work on a ticket, they move it from “Incoming” to “In Progress” and assign the ticket to theirself. They are now the ticket’s “primary caretaker” and responsible for carrying it through the rest of the workflow.

If the ticket becomes blocked, the assignee adds the blocked label (red) to signify its status. This helps call out tickets that might need attention or help. Once a ticket is unblocked, the label is removed.

When dev work is completed, the assigned dev moves the ticket to “UX Acceptance”.

UX Acceptance

In this column, the UX designer reviews the work.

If the work doesn’t meet the design requirements, the UX designer adds the label ux-changes-requested (red). The dev and designer work out the details of the necessary changes and decide whether to leave the ticket in this column or move it back to “In Progress”.

Otherwise, if the ticket work does meet design requirements, the UX designer adds the ux-approved label (green). This signifies to the dev that the ticket is ready to move to “Peer Review”.

Peer Review

During this step in the tickets lifecycle, another dev reviews code changes/PR and tests the implemented features for “functional correctness”. If changes are requested before approval, the ticket remains in “Peer Review” while the changes are made.

When another dev has fully reviewed the code and functional correctness of the work, they add the dev-approved label (green) to the ticket. The assigned dev then moves the ticket to “Ready to Promote”.

Ready to Promote

Here, the ticket work is ready to be promoted to QA for testing. In this column, the dev makes whatever additional preparation is needed (setting up Akkeris apps, pipelines, etc) for promoting the app to QA, stage, and prod.

Once completed, the dev promotes the changes to QA and moves the ticket to the “In QA” column.

In {ENV}

This indicates column that the ticket is ready for testing in the QA environment. The dev remains the primary assignee for the ticket; the SET who will test the ticket adds theirself as a secondard assignee.

In these columns, the SET completes all necessary testing and test development work for the given encironment. If testing results in additional dev changes that must be made, a conversation about moving the ticket back to the dev’s “In Progress” column takes place, if necessary.

When a ticket passes all of the testing in {ENV}, the SET adds the label {env}-passed (green). This signifies to the dev that the ticket is ready to be promoted to the next environment. The dev completes the necessary steps for promotion, and moves the ticket to the next column.

(This repeats from “In QA” to “In Stage”.)

Done

Once a ticket is promoted and tested in both QA and Stage, and labelled qa- and stage-passed, it’s done and ready to deploy to prod! Hooray! 🥳

Additional considerations

Alternative names

Working agreements